Monday, May 28, 2007

Tessalon Perle Cough How Does It Work

of arrogance and self-initiative

In Germany, there was radio last week, a discussion of a "media quartet" on the subject "Change Reporter readers and bloggers to journalism?". (I would have missed this, so at this point thanks to Stefan Niggemeier , who in his Blog already given his opinion. Gives the shipment is also available as MP 3 .) Here you get within of 40 minutes a worth listening insight on how the sensitivities are in the media industry, in terms of Mr. group of bloggers who seem to undermine the journalism the water. At the most dramatic it Manfred Bissinger gets to the point when he argues that blogs only as meaning " gerotzt " are. Let there be no thought, researched, or discussed in detail. Blogs are just "a series of sensitivities of people who have written for the journalism or the public any real significance."
Are blogs just really loose level, far away from any credibility prepared collection of "personal sensitivities"? Of course, there may be blogs that bring the world does not continue or complete the journalism can do and should they also not. In the public debate is the image of Mother Lies high sterilized under their medial "Flowers in the Garden" journal (which there are surely to hauf ), but the blogger world may not necessarily be only that. the investigative journalism can replace the individual citizen with his PC but also for that he simply lacks resources and opportunities.
A decent blog needs to journalism and its traditional media. For as actually many examples in Web 2.0 is based on these or other supplements this. For some issues, offers the Internet even possible to find public, this will always culminate with the performance and recording in the traditional media. can be replaced by the words out of the question. For one thing, bloggers and other Web 2.0 forms do not reach and also they will never get the credibility that the mainstream media have created over decades. Which defines the media quartet discussion of Tissy Bruns thrown in the round concept of counter-public so it's better.
say But now that everything can not level and the public have no meaning, bordering on arrogance schlichweg. As someone stands up and says, what I say has relevance, because I have access to the media. I can yell louder, so this must also be of importance. Certainly there are plenty of bright minds to find in the media, but there? Can not name many other topics and for their fellow human beings reading - prepare and well worth seeing - worth hearing? Does anyone not there for much too important? Take away Mr. Biting the spring, he will then not only insignificant, self-talk? It is not always gold that is in the blogs, it is usually really just sand, but what about in the media will not automatically lead to gold-platinum alloy. The Web
2.0 offers several of possibilities, not because his limitations and thus there is no selection. But since the devil is in the matter, for we can never read anything that is published. We were at the recent media not really, but the real still a bit clearer. Where they really have a head start, is credibility. Is not to say everything in the media is true and has value, they are supposed to dictate not opinion, but help to shape opinion. That is, the common people dealing with the content, evaluates and classifies. Whether it is on this table, the pub, hairdresser or make a stop on the internet their cause.
But the important internal activity, a sloping need media literacy be dei raise each one is, with so-free medium, such as a blog is nunmal, particularly in demand. count down to my person: I think I'm right, what gives me but not automatically right. Everyone needs to know for themselves!

0 comments:

Post a Comment